Strictly English Ielts Reading Answers -

Passage Title: The History of Tea

| Question No. | Answer | Keyword / Location Hint | |--------------|--------|--------------------------| | 1 | FALSE | Legend of Shennong (2737 BC) – passage says "mythological," not proven | | 2 | TRUE | Tang Dynasty – "tea became the national drink" | | 3 | NOT GIVEN | Portuguese priests – no mention of Japan in that paragraph | | 4 | TRUE | 17th century – "tea taxed heavily in Britain" | | 5 | FALSE | Boston Tea Party – "destroyed tea, not increased tax" | | 6 | China | "first cultivation of Camellia sinensis" | | 7 | medicinal | "originally consumed for health benefits" | | 8 | compressed | "tea leaves pressed into bricks for trade" | | 9 | Japan | "Buddhist monks introduced seeds from China to..." | | 10 | afternoon | "Anna, Duchess of Bedford, created ___ tea ritual" | | 11 | India | "British planted tea in Assam to break Chinese monopoly" | | 12 | oxidation | "black vs green tea depends on level of ___" | | 13 | 5,000 | "over ___ years of continuous use" | Topic: Some people believe that governments should spend more money on railways rather than roads. Others think the opposite. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Essay In many countries, debates persist over whether public funds should prioritise railway expansion or road infrastructure. While both transport modes are essential, each has distinct advantages. This essay will discuss both perspectives before concluding that a balanced approach is preferable, though with a slight emphasis on railways. strictly english ielts reading answers

In conclusion, both roads and railways serve irreplaceable roles. However, given the urgent need to reduce emissions and congestion, a modest shift in funding toward rail is justified, provided that rural road access is not compromised. Passage Title: The History of Tea | Question No

(Band 7+ level)

On the other hand, those advocating for greater railway spending point to environmental and efficiency benefits. Trains emit significantly less carbon dioxide per passenger-kilometre than cars or lorries, helping nations meet climate targets. Railways also reduce traffic congestion, which costs major cities billions annually in lost productivity. Furthermore, high-speed rail offers a time-competitive alternative to domestic flights and road travel for medium distances. Countries like Japan and France have demonstrated that strategic rail investment drives regional economic integration. Discuss both views and give your opinion

In my opinion, governments should allocate slightly more to railways in the long term, especially for intercity and high-density corridors, while maintaining essential roads for rural and local access. A purely road-based system encourages car dependency and pollution, whereas neglecting roads leaves communities isolated. The optimal solution is integrated planning: expand electrified rail networks where demand is high, and use road budgets for maintenance and last-mile connections.